Of course, it is a rare case . . . in which a law survives strict scrutiny.
74
As one
prominent authority noted, [w]hen some form of heightened scrutiny is applied, the law may
properly be regarded as presumptively invalid, and likely to be struck down.
75
This case presents no exception to the general rule of constitutional infirmity. The FTC
has not proffered any compelling interest that is served by singling out the commercial speech
of Internet and Web services firms for restrictions imposed on virtually no other businesses. To
the contrary, inasmuch as the proposed amendments to the TSR create unique obstacles to the
marketing of commercial Internet access service, the Commission's proposal actively
undermines the high priority that both Congress and the administration have placed on speeding
the deployment of high speed Internet service.
76
The FTC's proposal to target Web and Internet
access services for special selective regulations also runs counter to the Commission's
traditionally cautious approach to adopting rules and policies that could retard the growth of the
Internet economy. As Commissioner Swindle observed, considering the size and importance of
this economic sector, [t]he economic consequences of government actions in e commerce will
74
Burson v. Freeman
, 504 U.S. 191, 211 (1992).
75
1 Rodney A. Smolla & Melville B. Nimmer,
Freedom of Speech
, 4:3 (1999).
76
See
Remarks by Secretary of Commerce Donald L. Evans to the Precursor Group, February 6, 2002,
available at
http://osecnt.doc.gov/public.nsf/docs/Evans Precursor Group ( We're working on ways to help accelerate
broadband deployment and usage . . . . NTIA will work closely with the FCC to craft the right regulatory policies to
facilitate broadband deployment and the creation of a competitive broadband marketplace . . . . ); Remarks of
Commerce Assistant Secretary and NTIA chief Nancy Victory, January 23, 2002,
available at
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/speeches/2002/ outlook_012302.htm ( broadband issues are a top priority for
President Bush and his administration );
see also
S. Rep. No. 104 230, at 50 (1995) ( deployment of advanced
telecommunications services is one of the primary objectives of the Telecommunications Act of 1996);
Telecommunications Act of 1996, 706, Pub. L. 104 104, Title VII, Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 153, reproduced in the
notes to 47 U.S.C. 157 (directing the FCC to conduct yearly review of deployment and make any regulatory
changes necessary to ensure that high speed internet access, among other capabilities, is being expeditiously
deployed).
25