DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2004)2/FINAL
One further consideration is worth noting. One of the primary concerns of business users of domain
names is to protect their customers from fraudulent use of names associated with their business. In some
instances business users may have already reached the point where they will not contest all names
containing their trademark as part of a string. Placing a well known brand name, as a key word, into a
Whois? search engine will commonly result in more than several thousand registrations.
37
In many cases
firms will only seek to take action against registrants creating Websites that are misleading or fraudulent or
using e mail in the same manner. This appears to be evident from the number of cases brought before the
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) system established by WIPO, which have been
decreasing (
Table 17
). Notably this has occurred at a time of expansion in the number of gTLDs. Some
attribute this decrease to sunrise periods or other measures adopted by new gTLDs.
38
It is worth noting that in 2003 the number of challenges involving names under
.biz
and
.info
halved
from the previous year. In the first half of 2004 there appears to have been a significant further reduction.
Indeed, there were only three UDRP challenges for
.biz
from the beginning of 2004 until 7 June 2004
(Table 18). One notable difference between
info
and
.biz
is that the latter is intended for business and
commercial users whereas
.info
is open to all registrants. As a result of this policy there is additional
challenge procedure available for registrations under
.biz
. The Restrictions Dispute Resolution Policy
(RDRP) for .
biz
is exclusive to that gTLD. The RDRP is used to resolve disputes between domain name
registrants and third parties asserting that the disputed domain name has been registered in violation of
the
.biz
registration restrictions. Registrations under
.biz
must be used or intended to be used primarily for
bona fide business or commercial purposes.
39
Overall the question of whether a tipping point may one day be reached, in terms of firms not
engaging in defensive registrations, is an open one. The data do indicate a trend toward less challenges
under UDRP processes even at the time of the introduction of new gTLDs. That being said, if users stop
challenging infringement of their trademark, a court might see this as being passive in defending that
trademark and as a consequence, count that against the company for any particular case in the future. On
the other hand, the court would most likely also consider the reasonableness of defending all potential
cases if the number of gTLDs is expanded.
Table 17. Number of cases involving gTLDs brought before the UDRP Process
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
gTLD UDRP Cases
1
1 841
1 506
1 181
1 053
Source
: WIPO.
40
Table 18. Number of domain names challenged, involving individual gTLD names, before the URDP Process
.com
.net
.org
.info
.biz
Total
Number of names
1466 235
123 115
74
2013
(2002)
Percent of Total
72.83%
11.67%
6.11%
5.71%
3.68%
Number of Names
1378 177 84 50
33
1722
( 2003)
Percent of Total
80.02%
10.28%
4.88%
2.90%
1.92%
Number of Names
673 54
33 18
9
788
(January June 7th
2004)
Percent of Total
85.53%
6.85%
4.91%
2.28%
1.14%
Note
: Some cases involve more than one gTLD in the same case or multiple names under the same gTLD. In other words some
cases involve more than one domain name. The data shown here are by the number of names rather than the number of cases as in
Table 17.
Source
: OECD, based on WIPO.
35